Modelling Understanding and Sensory Streams
Introduction
What does it mean for a system to understand? This is a question I've been wrestling with ever since I started building AI tools that interact with database systems. Databases are, in a sense, the memory of an application โ structured, queryable, persistent. But memory alone doesn't produce understanding.
Sensory Streams in AI Systems
In biological systems, understanding emerges from the continuous integration of sensory streams โ visual, auditory, proprioceptive. The brain doesn't process snapshots; it processes flows. A similar principle may apply to artificial systems.
When the DBA Intelligent Agent monitors a SQL Server instance, it isn't just reading a static snapshot of wait stats or blocking sessions. It's processing a stream of events over time โ queries arriving, locks being acquired and released, memory pressure building and subsiding.
Modelling Understanding
My hypothesis is that genuine understanding in an AI system requires:
- Temporal integration โ the ability to relate current state to past state over meaningful windows of time
- Causal modelling โ not just correlating events, but representing why they co-occur
- Predictive capability โ generating expectations about future states and being surprised when they're violated
A system that can do all three isn't just pattern-matching; it's modelling.
Where This Takes Us
I'm developing these ideas further in my research at thereallearnwithme.com. The intersection of database cognition, sensory stream processing, and language model reasoning is, I believe, one of the most fertile areas in applied AI.
More posts to follow.